Business News : Winners and ‘Losers’ of the Special-Dividend Bonanza
As you’ve probably heard by now, if no deal is reached before Dec. 31, America will go over the “fiscal cliff,” which features big cuts in government spending and a series of tax hikes. Among the levies set to go higher (much higher) are taxes on dividends, where the effective rate would rise to 43.4% for top taxpayers vs. the current Bush-era rate of 15%.
In an effort to preempt such a steep hike in dividend taxes, hundreds of companies have either issued “special” dividends in recent weeks or accelerated dividends originally set to be paid in 2013.
The special-dividend bonanza has been a huge windfall for some corporate insiders, notably company founders such as Oracle’s Larry Ellison, who “saved” a staggering $76.9 million in taxes by taking a dividend this month rather than last month. (The numbers in the accompanying slideshow are calculated based on SEC filing data and shareholders’ summaries from Morningstar, as of Dec. 6.)
Clearly there’s an economic incentive for corporations to pay the dividends now vs. taking the risk of a big tax bill later. On the surface, there’s no downside to paying special dividends or accelerating 2013 payments into 2012 – no “losers” in this scenario.
Taking a (populist) step beyond that, the special tax bonanza also reveals, once again, the folly of calling some companies “public” or “shareholder owned” – unless you’re taking about the insiders, founders and their heirs. Citing Markit, CNBC reports companies paying accelerated or special dividends have an average insider ownership of 27 percent — higher than the broader market.
“There’s a school of thought that says managers should return capital to shareholders much more often than they do, in part to avoid spending that money on ill-advised strategies,” says Sydney Finkelstein, a management professor at Dartmouth’s Tuck School and author of Why Smart Executives Fail and Think Again. “One could also argue that they are maximizing shareholder value by paying special dividends, since taxes are likely to go up.”
“Having said all that, it sure looks like insiders are trying to maximize their personal wealth,” he says.
At the end of the day, the avalanche of special dividends is another reminder of a reality that’s so obvious most folks don’t even notice it: Many companies – including some blue-chips – exist largely to serve the interest of a select few individuals, rather than the employees or minority shareholders, much less the community at large.
*Siemond Chan contributed to this report
source : yahoo